About Me

Name: Jon
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Oh, No! Not Again!!

A gunman has hostages in a Colorado high school.

Difference... the shooter is not a fellow student, he's been described as a man in his mid-30s, and he claims to have a bomb.  My understanding is that 2 girls are being held, and this may be a result of a divorce/custody battle.

Live streaming audio at 850-AM KOA in Denver.

UPDATE (3:50 PM MDT):  One individual has been removed on a stretcher, critically wounded.  Reports say it's one of the female students... being flown out on a "Flight-for-Life" helicopter.

UPDATE (9/28 7:12 AM):  As you've no doubt heard, the shooter appears to have murdered the young girl, Emily Keyes, and then killed himself.  "The coward's way out," as the local sheriff put it.  This animal is said to have sexually assaulted some of his hostages.  Words fail.

When the Columbine tragedy had struck, I had been married for only a few months.  That was horrible enough, but now that I have two grade school kids, it seems so much more personal.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

7-Eleven boots Citgo

Hey, this is great news!!  7-Eleven does the right thing!

Like I said earlier, here in Colorado, 7-Eleven is the only place to buy Citgo gasoline.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conclusions from the NIE Leak: Untestable Hypotheses

There has been great debate over the past couple of days, based on the leaked excerpts from the April 2006 National Intelligence Estimate.  I'd just like to add my 2 cents.

First, I am amused by the spectacle of United States Senators putting into the Congressional Record information that they have gleaned from LEAKED confidential intelligence data!!  After the hystrionics of the Plame Kerfuffle, don't they see just a little bit of irony here?

Probably not.  However, my main point is this:  what we can surmise from the leaked portion of the NIE is that the War in Iraq is providing recruiting material for the Jihadists, which is resulting in an increased number of holy warriors, bent on self-immolation and murder.

Okay.  Prove it!

The fact is, you cannot.  This is an untestable hypothesis.  The planet we live on is not a lab where controlled experiments can be run.  It is impossible to truly measure how many new jihadi recruits there would be in the absence of the Iraq invasion and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.  Such a world does not exist, except in Sheehanist fantasies.

Conjecture on both sides could come up with some reasonable arguments.  It is clear that Muslim anger has never been higher around the world.  Or is it?  Certainly there are more TV cameras out there capturing the rage for us, but does that mean it is more widespread?  I don't know, and I would like to know how the NIE would claim to quantify such a thing.

I could easily contend that 9/11 itself, in absence of any of the actions by the United States which came in the months and years afterward, would have been a huge recruitment boost for Jihad.

On the other hand, even if there is huge new recruitment of radical Islamic terrorists, we are killing them in their hundreds on the streets of Baghdad, and elsewhere.  That was the gist of the "Flypaper Theory" that floated about in the days leading up to and after the invasion in 2003.  US military presence in Iraq would act as a magnet, or flypaper, to the jihadis, and we could kill them at the time and place of our choosing, not in the Homeland.

All this conjecture can seem reasonable, depending on the mood of the day, but I would contend that there is no real way to know if populations of terrorists would really be different had we not invaded Iraq.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bush & Clinton: Compare and Contrast

 I do get a chuckle out of Clinton's behavior, but it is oddly reminiscent of George Bush's interview with Matt Lauer.  The only difference is, in my mind, that Chris Wallace treats all his interviewees the same.  Note the aggressive questioning Lauer uses with Bush.  Now compare that with Lauer's compatriots in recent interviews with Clinton, shown by Michelle in excerpt here.

The MSM becomes so obsequious in Clinton's presence.  Doesn't it just make you want to go and shower?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What a Baby!

Well, Bill Clinton's Fox News meltdown over the weekend has been well documented.  But, I would like to touch on a bit where Clinton hit a pet peeve of mine.

Quoth Bubba"What did I do? I worked hard to try and kill him. I authorized a finding for the CIA to kill him. We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody has gotten since. And if I were still president we’d have more than 20,000 troops there trying to kill him."

Oh, Bill.  "I got closer to killing him"???  Mr. Clinton, I respectfully ask, did you put on the BDU?  Did you strap on a helmet, and night-vision goggles?  Did you live in the dirt and grime of a third world backwater, trying to hunt down this guy and get into a position where you could pull the trigger?

Didn't think so.

I work with this kind of manager all the time.  "I did this, I did that."  They are the worst kind of show-boaters.  They never acknowledge that there are lots of other people out there in the labs in my case, or in the battlefields in Bill Clinton's case, who are doing the heavy lifting.  And in Clinton's case, the heavy lifters are doing a lot more than missing dinner with the wife and kids because they are stuck at work on a tough engineering problem.  Their lives are on the line, and this tacit dismissal of the contribution of the agents in the field is disgusting.

I am a "we" fetishist.  I absolutely always talk about accomplishments that "we" made.  In almost every endeavor you can think of, it should always be about "we," and even if you don't mean it, talking about "we" builds amity amongst your team -- although, if you don't really mean it, the team will figure that out, "sooner rather than later," as Mr. Clinton used to enjoy saying.

But this lack of humility coming from the 42nd President of the United States shouldn't be surprising anymore, should it?

I close by quoting Ronald Wilson Reagan (who was himself quoting Truman):  "It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit."

UPDATE (9/25):  "And you’ve got that little smirk on your face. It looks like you’re so clever…"  Boy, you really told him, Bill.  Come on, man.  What kind of grown-up talks like that? 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Boycott Citgo?

Right now, I lean towards, yes.  That idiot Chavez doesn't need another dime of American money.

BUT... I say this with the understanding that most Citgo stations are probably owned by private franchisees, small businessmen and women.  Won't they be hardest hit?  On the other hand, I don't know how the rest of the country is, but in Colorado, the only places to buy Citgo gas are 7-Eleven stores.  I bet if enough pressure were put on 7-Eleven, they could arrange for a different fuel franchise partner.

UPDATE (9/22):  Malkin is on board!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Many Times Must This Happen...

... before our elected officials put an end to illegal immigration.

This was one of the most gruesome crimes I can remember in Colorado.  And it was so preventable.  The cops had this guy in their hands, dead to rights, this past April.  But, due to a series of errors, he was released without so much as a speeding ticket.

Allow me to ask, do you think that an average Coloradan could get pulled over with tags flagged by the Feds, provide a clearly fake ID (not a US drivers license), and not provide proof auto insurance as required, and get off scot free?  Would a magistrate flatly dismiss these charges if it was you or me?  Not having a valid proof of auto insurance is enough, in Colorado, to lose your driving privileges, at the very least.

Well, in Denver, you apparently can get away with it if you are an "undocumented" alien, as this creep evidently was.  Denver has been known far and wide as a "sanctuary city" for a number of years.  It's a safe place for illegal immigrants, especially from Mexico and the rest of Latin America.  And so, while thousands of workers come to the region in search of work, since the government is turning a blind eye, the city is bound to attract less savory people, who are looking to disappear.

Recently, in special session, the state legislature passed an "anti-sanctuary bill" specifically to counteract the flouting of law going on in Denver, Aspen and other liberal bastions in the state.  Hopefully, that means that in the future the police won't be told to ignore violations of our immigration laws.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ann Coulter Does It Again

Boy, I'm never sure how I feel about Ann Coulter.  Generally speaking, I agree with her politics, as you might imagine from a regular reader of Townhall.  But, she really is abrasive, and sometimes I do agree with her critics, she goes too far.

So, I link to Ann's latest with some trepidation, but in large agreement.  I cannot, for the life of me, figure out what John McCain is up to with this insistance on the primacy of Geneva.  In the best of all possible worlds, yeah, we should absolutely abide by the Geneva Conventions.  We have signed on the dotted line... they have our word on it... need any other cliches?

But, I will put it more briefly than Ann does:  when have we ever faced an enemy who has abided by Geneva?  The Germans?  Japan?  Communist Korea?  North Vietnam?  Iraq?  Somalia?  Can you think of one?

The fact of the matter is that this is why they are (or were) our enemies!!!  In any given case, if you have a nation who we are assured will abide by the Geneva Conventions, chances are about 100% that they're not our enemy.  Brutal dictatorships, communist oligarchies, and what have you, tend not to value human life, tend to abuse their own citizens, tend to covet other territory... and what an odd coincidence, they tend to violate accepted standards for treatment of captured combatants.  Who's surprised by this?

This will come as a shock to American leftists, but we are the Good Guys.  There are reasons that they are the Bad Guys (and no, it's not because they're sitting on a gazillion barrels of oil).
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Singapore Hosts the IMF/World Bank Meetings

 I was wondering how this would work out when I heard it a few months ago.  Singapore is hosting the International Monetary Fund/World Bank meetings this month, and already protesters are in an uproar (as if they wouldn't be in an uproar, anyway).

Turns out that Singapore is blocking most of the protesters from even getting on the island, and when they are do get in to the country, they are limited to a protest area which is 8 meters square.  The idea makes me smile.

I have been to Singapore many, many times.  If I were to chose one word to describe this tiny island nation, it would be "orderly."  I don't know that your average American would really like to live in an environment like this, although I did briefly entertain the idea of taking an expat job there... a temporary expat job!!  So, I knew that it would be interesting to see what would happen when a bunch of anarchist protesters clashed with the one nation in the world that I would say is as far from anarchy as possible.

I also thought back to the
story of young Michael Fay, who you might recall, was caned in Singapore... for spray-painting cars!!!  Imagine the carnage inflicted on rock-throwing anti-globalization protesters!!!

So, the protesters are agast that their right to protest is being infringed, and no less a worthy than the arch-neo-con Paul Wolfowitz is joining with the chorus calling this a PR disaster for Singapore.

I can tell you right now that Singapore does not care what the rest of the world thinks.  They look at the results.  You need to see Singapore.  This is not a third-world country.  The streets are clean and safe, much moreso than most American cities, and for the most part the citizens are satisfied with their lot in life.  There are a lot of cynical and ironic jokes about the government, there, but rarely is a voice raised in anger.

And, frankly, the anti-IMF anarchists have brought this on themselves.  Every time the IMF meets, the world is treated with video of street mobs throwing rocks through windows and at police lines, and the mobs being beaten back by firehoses and tear gas.  They've made a reputation for themselves.

So, enjoy your little 8x8 pen, my dear protesters.  Reminds me of when I send my kids for "time out."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Big Win for Porkbusters!

This is fabulous news.

And, in Colorado, our reps voted for the most part along party lines.  Only John Salazar, the Democrat from Colorado's 3rd district joined the Republicans in voting "aye."

DeGette and Udall... lost causes.  Bob Beauprez, who is now running for Governor of our great state, voted "aye."

I haven't seen the Senate results, just yet, but I'm quite sure that Sen. Allard will have voted "aye."  Should be interesting to see if Sen. Ken Salazar will join his brother on the good side!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dec. 31 Cannot Come Soon Enough

So, Kofi Annan has this to say:

"Most of the [Middle East] leaders I spoke to felt that the invasion of Iraq and its aftermath have been a real disaster for them ... They believe it has destabilized the region."

Well, hold on one second there, brother!  "Most of the leaders" in that region are despots and dictators!!  We're supposed to think this is a bad thing?

I say that with tongue partially in cheek, but in all seriousness, I simply cannot wait for the day that this idiot no longer holds this office.  It's hard for me to believe that Lefties think George Bush a dim bulb, and this guy gets a pass for the idiotic things he says.

Of course a war would de-stabilize the region.  It was meant to.  The whole point of this thing was to start a process where democracy replaces the corrupt dictatorships that blight the region.  If this had gone according to theory, these guys would be feeling a lot more than instability.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tiger Cubs!!

Well this is fun. 

Last night I went innocently to an organational meeting for our local Cub Scout pack with my 6 year old son.  I went in hopes of getting my son starting into Scouting, but I got more.  I volunteered to be the Den Leader for my son and a group of 1st grade boys.

I am really looking forward to this.  The kids and their folks seem like a great group.  However, I've never done this before, and I was a bit caught off-guard when I raised my hand to volunteer (someone had to do it!).  Any other Scout leaders out there?  Any advice?

I was a Scout when I was a kid... but that was a LOOOONG time ago!!!

The only thing I'm not looking forward to:  wearing that uniform again for the first time in 25 years!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Message from Al Qaeda

Michelle Malkin reports on the latest message from Al Qaeda.

Often, the press reports that intelligence officers look for hidden messages in these videos, possibly signals to sleepers in the field to take action.  Does this quote, "the days are pregnant and giving birth to new events with Allah’s permission and guidance," strike anyone else as kinda creepy?  Who talks like that?

I've no doubt that our intel guys are on top of this... and I sure hope I'm just having a little case of the 9/11 willies.

UPDATE (9/12):  Followed by an attack on the US Embassy in Syria?  Call me crazy, but...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BYU Prof Put on Leave: More 9/11 Conspiracy News

I just heard about this on the radio a few minutes ago.  The BYU physics professor who has been a stalwart in the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory circles has been put on paid leave by the University.

This thing is really getting out of control.  I've been getting more and more worried about the left in this country. 

Why? you ask.  Well, back in the '90s, I was involved peripherally in the militia movement, the right wing anti-government "conspiracists."  Oh, I never actually went out in the woods on militia maneuvers or anything like that, but I picked up the pamphlets at gun shows, and was mildy concerned about Janet Reno, and Waco, and Ruby Ridge, and the incidents that became buzz-words back then.  I bet my dislike for Bill Clinton was pretty close to the level of today's Bush haters.

But, remember Oklahoma City?  That day was the culmination of all that paranoia.  Timothy McVeigh and his pals were probably too extreme for even the rightest of the right-wingers (I seem to recall that he actually got kicked out of the Michigan Militia or one of those groups).  But, still, his radicalized, sociopathic views were born out of the militia movement.

If anything, to me it seems today's Extreme Left is even nuttier than the Extreme Right of the 90's.  My worry is this:  how much more of the paranoia, the delusion, the hatred will it take for the Left to create its own Timothy McVeigh?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where I Was

It is a cliche, now... you'll always remember where you were when <insert traumatic news event here>.

Not being one to shy away from a cliche, I just wanted to relate my experience on that memorable, tragic day... can it be five years ago, already? 

It was warm and sunny in Colorado, too, as I woke up to do my "morning constitution".  I have a small radio in my bathroom, and was listening to talk radio, and heard the newsies talking about a plane that crashed into the World Trade Center.  As we all remember, the first reports described it as a "small plane."  Since I was hearing this on the radio, my first thought was that the weather in NY must have been pretty bad.  Secondly, I have a number of friends who work at our local FAA office, so I was thinking that my buddies would have a very busy day.  Someone at the FAA was going to catch it, I thought.

Then I went to turn on the tube, and saw that it was a bright, sunny day in New York, too, and thought... what the <expletive>!!!  Looking at the gigantic hole in the tower, I knew that this "small plane" report was bunk, immediately.  And then moments later, the second plane hit, right there on Fox News, and I knew, like everyone else, that this was no accident.

I should have been getting ready for work, but I couldn't move from the TV.  I had waked my wife, with "honey, you have got to see this!"  I was sitting on the edge of our bed, clicking through the news channels, and I seem to remember being on ABC when the first tower came down.  I think maybe it was Charlie Gibson (or perhaps Jennings had come on by then) talking over the pictures, and apparently he did not notice what was going on... he kept on with his narrative as the tower collapsed and a few moments after.  He's not even watching his monitor, I thought.  Then I looked at my wife, and said, "My God, thousands of people just died."

Boy, I can almost feel the waves of exhaustion rolling over me in those moments.  You see, my daughter was less than a month old at that time... needless to say, my wife and I were not sleeping much in those days.  I drove into work in a daze, and I couldn't help myself from looking up at the sky from time-to-time... what else is going to crash down on us?

No work got done at the office that day.  We crowded into the few cubicles where some of our co-workers had portable radios.  We heard the rumors of more hijackings, missing planes, a car bomb at the State Department, evacuations at the Capitol, Air Force One was a target.  It was just crazy.  Soon, many of us drifted into our Company's fitness center, the only room in the building with TVs.  All were tuned to CNN, and no one was working out.

By noon, our managers told us to go home to our families, and I did, still spending too much of my drive looking up at the clear blue sky, instead of keeping my eyes on the road.  I was so glad to be going home to my wife, my son and my new baby girl.

It hadn't quite hit me, yet, that so many people were not going home from work that day.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »